ΞΈ^=n1ββi=1nβΞΌ(Xiβ) where ΞΌ(x)=E[Yβ£X=x]
has less variance than the standard Monte Carlo estimator nβ1βi=1nβYiβ.
In other words, part of the expectation calculation can help reduce the variance of the simulation.
Remarks:
For any choice of the random variable X, the conditional Monte Carlo method yields a variance reduction. But a good choice of X yields a high correlation between E[Yβ£X] and Y
We can find E[Yβ£X] precisely in an analytical form only when we assume a βniceβ model for the underlying stochastic process
Under several examples of SDE, such conditional expectations are readily computable
Examples
Example (1): Rare event probability
Suppose we want to estimate ΞΈ=P(STβ>u) for some u. This arises in the case of a digital option. For example, STβ=exp(βi=1TβYiβ) for some random variables Y1β,...,YTβ. Hence
ΞΈ=P(βi=1TβYiβ>log(u))
Denote LTβ=βi=1TβYiβ and MTβ=max1β€iβ€TβYiβ, we can then introduce the conditioning on the maximum,
where eβrT/2E[(STββK1β)+ββ£ST/2β] and eβrT/2E[(STββK2β)+ββ£ST/2β] can be calculated with BS European call formula (with S0β=ST/2β, maturity time T/2, interest rate r, and strike price K1β, K2β).
Example (3): Knock-in Option
Consider the digital knock-in option with a payoff
h(STβ)=1{STβ>K}1{min1β€kβ€mβS(tkβ)<H}
With S(tnβ)=S(0)exp(Lnβ),Lnβ=βi=1nβXiβ, we get
h(STβ)=1{Lmβ>log(K/S(0))}1{Ο<m}
where Ο is the first k such that Lkβ<log(H/S(0))
To find E[h(STβ)], we can use the importance sampling method, which requires choices of two changes of measure. Alternatively, we have